At the end of November, the Office of National Statistic (ONS) released its latest update in its Measuring National Wellbeing programme. This is an ambitious project that seeks to develop a broader and more balanced measure of progress than GDP alone.

The data shows that, despite more than doubling our wealth, life satisfaction in the UK has barely moved (see graph below). This phenomenon is known as the Easterlin paradox.

Some clues as to what some of the underlying drivers of wellbeing might be are to be found in cross-national data. The graph below plots GDP per capita against life satisfaction across countries.

The data shows the traditional curvilinear relationship of rising life satisfaction with increased GDP per capita, but diminishing returns at higher income levels (including at those enjoyed in the UK). It also shows that some countries with similar levels of wealth have different levels of life satisfaction. People in Brazil and Venezuela, for example, enjoy much higher levels of life satisfaction than countries with similar levels of GDP per capita. 

Studies show that factors associated with higher levels of wellbeing include levels of social trust, social relationships, and inequality. Academic research also demonstrates that wellbeing is predictive of other outcomes too – such as how long you will live or how productive you are at work.

Jeremy Heywood, the Cabinet Secretary, recently called for the Civil Service to be at the forefront of this new research agenda, so that policy makers in the UK focus not just on how to strengthen economic growth, but also how to increase the wellbeing of the population.

Global life satisfaction against GDP per capita

Date posted: December 5, 2012 | Author: | 4 Comments »

Categories: Uncategorized


4 comments on “National wellbeing vs GDP per capita

  1. Jason Lowther on said:

    It’s very exciting that the UK civil service is taking well being so seriously. I think we’re missing a trick, though, in not publishing the well being survey data at local authority area level – certainly for the major cities where the sample size would be pretty robust. We know much of the variation in well being relates to issues best addressed at local level?

  2. Jon Yates on said:

    Have you guys looked at practical interventions the state can make to build trust to raise well-being? We at The Challenge Network are the largest provider of National Citizen Service – working with 30,000 young people, 2000 schools, 900 businesses and 1500 community groups over next two years. We have trust and belonging data for all of the last four years of delivery. More than happy to discuss.

  3. Behavioural Insights Team on said:

    Hi Jason

    Data has been published by ONS at a county level, see:

    http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/HTMLDocs/dvc34/well-being_map.html

    or

    http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/interactive/well-being-interactive-graph/index.html (regional + other factors)

    If you want to go down to a lower level, CLG has developed modelled estimates based on analysis of the wellbeing of ACORN groups:

    http://opendatacommunities.org/datasets?theme=wellbeing

    and you can map wellbeing in your area at:

    http://opendatacommunities.org/dashboard

    Analysts are currently working on local estimates based on MOSAIC (enabling us to estimate wellbeing by postcode).

    BIT

  4. Behavioural Insights Team on said:

    Hi Jon

    Feel free to get in contact.

    Best wishes

    BIT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

HTML tags are not allowed.